PHONOLOGY
has been described as the study of speech sounds and their patterns. It is a
study based on the ‘phoneme’ or smallest significant unit of speech. Morphology
is the study of morphemes, which are the smallest significant units or grammar.
This definition becomes more comprehensible if you look at some examples. If
you examine such pattern as:
(a) cat cats
mat mats
bat bats
or:
(b) cook cooked
look looked
book booked
you
will see that in (a) plurality is indicated by adding +s to
the singular noun thus:
singular plural
cat cat + s
mat mat +s
bat bat +s
In
each example, there are two morphemes, the morpheme ‘cat’ (or the morpheme
‘mat’ or ‘bat’) and the morpheme ‘s’ which in many English words marks the
difference between singular and plural. In (b) there is the following patterns:
Present Past
cook cook +ed
look look +ed
book book +ed
where
the ‘ed’ morpheme indicates the past tense for many English verbs.
FREE
AND BOUND MORPHEMES
If
you look at a number of other examples you can establish different categories
of morpheme. The words:
unmanly
meaningless
can
be split up into:
un+man+ly
and:
mean+ing+less
In
both these examples, the words are composed of three morphemes, only one of
which can occur in isolation:
that
man is very tired.
What
do you mean?
Morphemes
which can occur freely on their own are called ‘free’ morphemes. Morphemes
which can only occur as affixes are described as ‘bound’ morphemes (or affixes)
are divided into two types: those like ‘dis-‘ and ‘un-‘ which precede words
(that is, free morphemes) and which are called prefixes and those like ‘-ly’
and ‘-ness’ which follow free morphemes and which are called suffixes.
ALLOMORPHS
Often,
morphemes which fulfill the same function have slightly different forms. If you
look at the following three words:
slammed
slipped
stilted
you
will notice that, in the written form, they all have the ‘-ed’ morpheme
indicating the past tense. When you pronounce these words, however, you become
aware that the ‘-ed’ morpheme has three different forms:
/slæmd/
/slıpt/
/stıltıd/
/d/
in ‘slammed’, /t/ in ‘slipped’ and /ıd/ in ‘stilted’. When a morpheme has
alternative forms the various forms are known as ‘allomorphs’.
Take another example. Some English
adjective form their opposites by prefixing the bound morpheme ‘in-‘:
capable incapable
tolerant intolerant
Often,
however, the negative morpheme changes ‘n’ to the consonant of the word it
prefixes:
legal illegal
mobile immobile
regular irregular
‘il- ‘, ‘im-‘, ‘in-‘ and
‘ir-‘ can thus be called allomorphs.
DERIVATIONAL
MORPHOLOGY
Morphology
fulfils two main functions in English. Morphemes can be used to form new words:
beauty
+ ful > beautiful
danger
+ ous > dangerous
or
to inflect verbs and nouns:
look,
look+s, look+ing, look+ed
tree,
tree+s
The
first category is known as derivational morphology and it involves prefixation:
re
+ turn > return
un
+ true > untrue
suffixation:
man
+ ly > manly
wicked
+ ness > wickedness
or
affixation involving both prefixation and suffixation:
un
+ speak + able > unspeakable
sub
+ conscious + ly > subconsciously
Commonly
occurring prefixes are ‘be-‘, ‘en-, ‘ex-‘, ‘hyper-‘, ‘pre-‘, ‘pro-‘, ‘re-‘,
‘sub-‘, ‘super-‘ and ‘trans-‘. Prefixes alter meaning but do not always change
the function of the word to which they are prefixed:
prefix Free
morpheme (Class) Result(Class)
be witch (n.) bewitch
(v)
de limit (v.) delimit
(v.)
en rich (adj.) enrich
(v.)
ex terminate (v.) exterminate
(v.)
hyper market (n.) hypermarket
(n.)
Commonly
occurring suffixes always change the class of the word to which they are attached:
beauty
(n.) + ful beautiful (adj.)
determine(v.) + ation determination (n.)
Words
ending in the moephemes ‘-acy’, ‘-ation’, ‘-er/-or’, ‘-ess’, ‘-ity’, ‘-ment’,
‘-ness’ and ‘-ship’ tend to be nouns:
democracy actor bewilderment
adoration mistress weakness
painter solemnity horsemanship
Words
ending n ‘-ise’/ize’ tend to be verbs:
epitomize
hospitalize
Words
ending in ‘-able’, ‘-ed’, ‘-ful’, ‘-ical’, ‘-ive’, ‘-less’, ‘-ous’ and ‘-y’
tend to be adjectives:
an
enjoyable film
a
polished performance
a
comical episode
a
diminutive person
a
helpless individual
a
workmanlike effort
an
industrious group
a
pretty girl
And
words which end in ‘-ly’ tend to be adverbs:
He
ran home quickly.
She
locked the doors securely.
Although
the above suffixes tend to be associated with particular word classes, it is
always worth remembering that, in English, it is only safe to judge the class
of an item when it has been seen in context. Thus, although ‘lovely’ and
‘friendly’ end in ‘-ly’ they function as adjectives and not as adverbs:
a lovely girl a friendly welcome
INFLECTIONAL
MORPHOLOGY
Whereas
derivational affixes often involve a change of class – such as the verb
‘attract’ becoming the adjective ‘attractive’ – inflectional suffixes never
involve a change of class. Inflectional morphology occurs with nouns, pronouns
and verbs. In nouns, inflection marks plurality in regular nouns:
book books
chair chairs
and
the possessive of all nouns:
John John’s book/books
the
man the man’s
book/books
the
men the men’s
book/books
the
builders the builders’
material/materials
Irregular
nouns often form their plurals by a vowel change:
foot feet
man men
mouse /maʊs/ mice /maıs/
but
they form the possessive in exactly the same way as regular nouns:
the
dog the
dog’s tail
the
mouse the mouse’s nose
There
is no difference in sound between a regular noun’s plural form and its
possessive:
the
doctor
the
doctor’s patients
the
doctors
the
doctors’ patients
In
the written medium, however, the apostrophe indicates whether or not we are
dealing with a possessive and whether or not the possessive is singular or
plural.
With
regard to verbs in English, inflectional suffixes are used to indicate present
tense agreement:
I
you look/sing
we
they
but:
he/she/it look+s/sing+s
and
the present participle:
look+ing/sing+ing
For
regular verbs the past tense and the past participle are formed by suffix
‘-ed’:
I look+ed/ I have look+ed
whereas,
with irregular verbs, the past tense and the past participle are often signaled
by a vowel change or a vowel change plus a suffix:
sing sang sung
take took taken
write wrote written
INFLECTION VERSUS DERIVATION
DERIVATIONAL MORPHOLOGY takes one word and changes it into
another, creating new lexical entries. In the clearest cases, it creates a word
of another syntactic category. For example, the suffix –ness changes adjectives into abstract nouns, as in fat-ness, dry-ness, and red-ness. The suffix –(e)r changes verbs into nouns, as in teach-er, erase-r, farm-er, and tease-r. the suffix -ify
changes nouns or adjectives into verbs, as in class-ify, pur-ify, and null-ify.
INFLECTIONAL MORPHOLOGY, on the other hand, does not change one
word into another and never changes syntactic category. Rather, it produces
another form of the same word. For example, when the English in inflectional
suffix –(e)s is added to a noun, it produces the plural form of the same noun,
not a new word. The same is true for other inflectional affixes:
-(e)s third
person singular present (on verbs)
-(e)d past
(on verbs)
As
it turns out, this is essentially all the inflectional morphology there is in
English; most other affixes (dozens of them) are derivational. Other languages
have much more inflectional morphology
than English does.
The
essential difference between inflection and derivation is whether the addition
of an affix creates a new word or just another form of the same word. There are
three other important differences between inflection and derivation. One
concerns PRODUCTIVITY: inflectional morphology is very
productive, while derivational
morphology usually is not. What this means is that if you take an
inflectional affix that normally goes on verbs, you should be able to attach it easily to newly invented or
borrowed words. English past tense marking is inflectional and so it is very
productive – when new verbs are coined, their past tense is automatically available
in the grammar. For example, English speakers added –(e)d to the new verb digitize
to form digitized without blinking an
eye.
Derivational
affixes, on the other hand, often cannot be used with such generality. Indeed,
they often cannot be used even on words that have been in the language for
centuries. Consider the following examples of derivational affixes; some work
and others fail. The ones that fail do so not because of any general rule, but
simply because the resulting words don’t happen to exist.
Good Bad
same-ness *different-ness
weakness *strong-ness
mad-ness *sane-ness
One
simply has to memorize which derived words contain –ness and which do not. This
memory load is hardly ever necessary with inflection.
Of course, some derivational affixes are
more productive than others. The suffix –er
is relatively productive; word game players know that practically any verb can
be turn into a noun by adding –(e)r.
so, we aren’t dealing with a hard and fast distinction, but in general
inflection is more productive than derivation.
Another
difference is that derivational affixes often have lexical meaning, while inflectional affixes usually have grammatical meaning. For example, one
meaning of the derivational suffix -er can be expressed as ‘a person who
…’, but the meaning of inflectional –(e)d
is best expressed with the technical term ‘past tense’.
The
third difference between inflection and derivation is that different inflected
forms of a word can usually be usefully organized into a type of chart called a
PARADIGM. For an example of this, we need to go to Spanish, a language that has
more inflectional morphology than English. Most books about Spanish present the
different forms of verbs in paradigms, the following chart of the present tense
of andar ‘to walk’.
Singular Plural
first
person ando andamos
second
person andas andais
third
person anda andan
SUMMARY
The
information on morphology can be summarized as follows:
Ingin mendapatkan eModul + Power Point Lengkap? Silahkan KLIK DI SINI dan pilih eModulnya.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar